An interactive model of structural opportunity

The Birth Lottery

You did not choose your country, your family, your health, or the world you were born into. This project explores what those unchosen conditions mean for the structural possibilities of a life.

"What kind of society would you design if you did not know who you would be in it?"— John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971)
🎲

Random Birth

Draw a life from global birth probabilities. See where chance places you.

👤

My Life

Enter your starting conditions and explore how your profile compares globally.

⚖️

Compare Lives

Place two profiles side by side. Change one variable and watch the gap appear.

📊

Structural Insights

Run simulations to find patterns across geography, wealth, sex, and cohort.

The philosophical position
"No one deserves his greater natural capacity nor merits his more favourable starting place in society." — Rawls

The term "birth lottery" is metaphorical. No one is literally assigned a life at random. But starting conditions are unchosen — and they shape the structural probabilities of a life in ways that are profound and often invisible. This project makes those inequalities visible.

Random Birth

Draw a life weighted by global birth probabilities.

Controls
Click to draw a random life profile.

My Life

Enter your starting conditions to calculate your structural profile.

Starting Conditions
Later life path — optional

Compare Lives

Place two birth profiles side by side and measure the structural gap.

Profile A
Profile B

Structural Insights

Analysis across thousands of simulated lives — revealing patterns, not predictions.

Pivot analysis
Presets:
Choose variables and click Run.
Country ranking
Click Show ranking to populate
Inequality gap analysis
Select focus and click Run
Counterfactual explorer — change one variable, see the structural impact
Time series — how would this profile score across cohorts?

Set a structural profile and see how the Starting Position Index changes across birth cohorts — revealing historical progress (or lack of it) in each country.

World population by structural band

How many people globally are born into each structural opportunity band? This view makes the rarity labels concrete — a "highly favorable" profile is genuinely exceptional in global terms.

Philosophy

The ideas behind the Birth Lottery.

The Birth Lottery is metaphorical, not literal

No one is literally assigned to a life at random. Each person is the result of a specific historical and biological chain. But no one chooses their starting conditions — their country, their family, their health, their historical moment. These conditions are unchosen and they matter enormously.

"The Birth Lottery is not about randomness in a physical sense. It is about the moral arbitrariness of starting conditions."

John Rawls and the Veil of Ignorance

Rawls, in A Theory of Justice (1971), proposed that we imagine designing a just society without knowing who we would be in it — our class, talent, nationality, or starting position. From behind this "veil of ignorance," we would choose fair principles because we could not assume we would land at the top. The Birth Lottery makes this thought experiment concrete with data.

John Rawls — A Theory of Justice, 1971
"No one deserves his greater natural capacity nor merits his more favourable starting place in society."

The model does not claim you could have been literally anyone else. It shows how much your unchosen starting conditions shape the structural probabilities of a life.

What the tool is not

  • Not a life prediction engine. The model shows structural conditions, not personal destinies.
  • Not a ranking of countries. Scores reflect structural opportunity — not value judgements about cultures.
  • Not a denial of agency. Individual effort and resilience matter. The model focuses on unchosen conditions because these are most often invisible.
  • Not false precision. All scores are directional approximations, not statistical exactness.
"A great deal of life begins before choice begins."

Method

How the model works, what it includes, and what it deliberately excludes.

Scoring logic

Base scores come from each country's structural profile, then personal starting conditions apply adjustments. All scores are clamped to [0, 100].

health = avg(healthBase, healthcareAccessBase)
education = educationBase
economic = avg(workBase, labourQualityBase, mobilityBase)
autonomy = avg(freedomBase, genderAutonomyBase)
safety = max(0, safetyBase − conflictRisk × 0.35)
wellBeing = wellBeingBase

SPI = (health + education + economic + autonomy + safety + wellBeing) / 6

Key adjustment magnitudes

VariableDimensions affectedMax delta
Family wealth (low→high)Health, education, economic, well-being, support±14 to ±18
Early health (poor→excellent)Health, education, economic, well-being−18 to +14
Parental educationEducation, economic, support±10
Family stabilityEducation, well-being, support±8
Urban / ruralEducation, economic, health±4
Birth cohortEducation, health, autonomy−4 to +7
Sex × gender autonomyAutonomy, economic, educationVaries by country

What the model excludes

  • Intelligence — not a fixed birth condition measurable at scale.
  • Religion — too contextually variable to generalise across countries.
  • Ethnicity and caste — critically important but omitted from the default model to avoid harmful oversimplification.
  • Life-course events — illness, economic shocks, relationships. The model focuses on birth luck only.